Monday, January 04, 2010

The Dance to Truth

While searching for familiarity on the terminology of Phenomenology, the greater question settled on my mind as to what Nature itself means.
Undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable. We must trust the perfection of the creation so far, as to believe that whatever curiosity the order of things has awakened in our minds, the order of things can satisfy. Every man's condition is a solution in hieroglyphic to those inquiries he would put. He acts it as life, before he apprehends it as truth. In like manner, nature is already, in its forms and tendencies, describing its own design. Let us interrogate the great apparition, that shines so peacefully around us. Let us inquire, to what end is nature  NATURE---Emerson, Ralph Waldo, 1803-1882

I would of course direct one's attention to the question of what Nature can mean here then. How we live with it and how it is applied to our circumstance for it to be "a truth for which we live and breathe."  "Walk the Talk" and live according too, is a measure of our judicial process  as to the finality of the road travelled with regards to our own life.

So what is the way in which you would perceive the road too, and how would you draw such a picture to best describe what you are seeing "as the way leading"  to a common front regarding predictions of science?

Dr. Roger Penrose, Oxford University

The idea of the predictions of science have to have a course in which to follow that accurately describes the process to which such predictions are made. Now, this kind of abstraction is correlated in my mind as to the way in which one could map the mind and the road toward such prediction,  and in following such a road, lead all to imagine that after such a journey, a verse can be expounded upon as to to what can possibly materialize out of such a "cloud gathering, " or a, "Light bulb" moment.

While giving this consideration,  such experimental processes were telling to me of where and what we were doing by focusing our attention directionally to a time in the fractions of second,  as to detail the very understanding of how the Universe came to be,  and how such correlation could have been spotted in the neural connection,  as if a space,  to which all information could enter.

But we know relatively little about how the circuitry of the brain represents the consonants and vowels. The chasm between the neurosciences today and understanding representations like language is very wide. It's a delusion that we are going to get close to that any time soon. We've gotten almost nowhere in how the bee's brain represents the simplicity of the dance language. Although any good biologist, after several hours of observation, can predict accurately where the bee is going, we currently have no understanding of how the brain actually performs that computation.

The thing was,  you had to provide that space in order to raise the question of what could have arisen out of it. What that space actually means. Now,  are these things real or imagined facets of the natural world,  or,  are they measurable things that we have been lead too, to direct our attention, and not call it some fictional representative of a wild Bumble bee Dance?


  1. I thought it important that the comment I made to William be copied to here.

    "At 11:57 AM, January 06, 2010, Blogger Plato said...

    Hi William,

    Better a question then, as to the descriptor of the "Nature of Time and Space?":)

    I would hope that I could placed before any scientist the question as to how each individual would "draw this diagram" as to the nature of prediction, is a dance of sorts between them self and the world.

    We are of course asking for responsibility in this process as to the "best image" that could possibly be deduced, that I would if could, place it before the as a question to all on the nature of this responsibility toward prediction.

    I gave two examples by way of Penrose and Bee, as seeing the topological explanation in terms of relativity, is ever the question dynamically on where exactly we are in relation to the natural world, geometrically described by example toward identifying our relationship with the world.

    Now I just given my example and now throw it out there for others to show how they would describe this "process to truth," as I have attempted to do."

    This comment provides for some inclination as to how we can process something and once we totally own it( becomes self evident), it becomes part of the "toposense of direction" on an abstract level.

    Having attain this toposense of a "fourth dimensional understanding" one then sees how this is applied in terms of how we can define our relationship topological relationship with the world around us.

    Between the inner/outer as a point between what we will take as a part of this inductive/deductive relationship, "to become part of" our truth.

    This does not in any way say how correct this truth is for you, but again provides for the soul's own court system of validation, that rests solely within the jurisdiction of how well as a soul progression you see you had advanced or retarded in the living of this life.


  2. This implies that our views of the world according to what we see now is cast within the light of "our life chosen."

    It also saids, that that each of us as we assume the coat or jacket we slip on as this body, we cover our eyes to the truth of what every soul knows, but forgets, casts us to the weight of this life which is masked from the truer color of our vision in emotive qualities, that can be much faster and more easily traversed in this relation to time.